FLUVIAL LANDFORMS
Victor R. Baker
Rivers flowing to the oceans drain about 68 percent of the Earth's land
surface. The remainder of the land either is covered by ice or drains to closed
basins. Areas draining to the sea are common in humid regions, whereas those
draining to interior closed basins occur in arid regions or in areas of active
tectonic subsidence. Some areas of the planet lack surface streams because of
extremely low rainfall or because lithologic conditions promote infiltration.
Data on the large rivers of the world are subject to numerous problems of
measurement and reliability. The most recent summary (Milliman and Meade, 1983)
discusses these problems, but it also reveals some startling facts Table 4-1. Only a score of the world's great rivers
are responsible for delivering over half the fresh water and total sediment load
to the world's oceans. The Amazon River alone carries about 15 percent of all the
water annually discharged by the world's rivers. The annual delivery of suspended
sediment to the ocean is about 13.5 x 10.9 metric tons. Over one-tenth of
this is delivered by one system, the Ganges-Brahmaputra. Even more remarkable
is the second most prolific source of sediment, the Huang He (Yellow River) of
China, which yields 1.08 x 10.9 tons per year. The Huang He has one-half the
drainage area and one-twentieth the water discharge of the
Ganges-Brahmaputra.
Although there are several excellent textbooks in fluvial geomorphology
(Gregory and Walling, 1973; Leopold et al., 1964; Richards, 1982),
all place an emphasis on small-scale processes. This chapter will introduce
the mega-geomorphology of rivers in the hope that it will stimulate a new
perspective on the science.
Table 4-1 Characteristics of the
World's Ten Largest Rivers | River | Drainage Area | Length
(km) | WATER DISCHARGE | Sediment Discharge | | (103 km2) | (km) | (m3/s) | (km3/yr) | (103t/yr) | | Amazon |
6150 | 6275 | 200000 | 6300 | 900000 | | Zaire (Congo) | 3820 | 4670 | 40000 | 1250 | 43000 | | Orinoco | 990 | 2570 | 34880 | 1100 | 210000 | | Ganges-Brahmaputra |
1480 | 2700 | 30790 | 971 | 1670000 | | Yangtze | 1940 | 4990 | 28540 | 900 | 478000 | | Mississippi-Missouri |
3270 | 6260 | 18390 | 580 | 210000 | | Yenisei | 2580 | 5710 | 17760 | 560 | 13000 | | Lena | 2500 | 4600 | 16300 | 514 | 12000 | | Mekong | 790 | 4180 | 14900 | 470 | 160000 | | Parana-La Plata | 2830 | 3940 | 14900 | 470 | 92000 | Milliman and Meade,
1983
SCENE CLASSIFICATION
The various regional study areas in this chapter are classified in terms of
either their drainage pattern or their channel pattern
Table 4-2. The classification is used merely to facilitate discussion, since
numerous aspects of the various study areas will be described in the plate
descriptions. Especially important are the process parameters (climate,
streamflow, and sediment loads) and the evidence of relict features that indicate
major past changes in the process parameters.
Table 4-2 Classification of Study Areas
Illustrating Fluvial Landorms | Drainage Patterns |
Plates | | Dendritic | Edwards Plateau, Texas (Plate F-) Loes Plateau, China (Plate
F-2) Huang He, China (Plate F-3) | | Centripetal | Elat and AL Jafr (plate F-4) |
| Structurally Controlled | Central
Yemen (Plate F-5) Colorado Plateau, Utah (Plate F-6) Grand Canyon,
Arizona (Plate F-7) Rio Caroní, Venezuela (Plate F-8) |
| Pediments | Tucson, Arizona (Plate F-9) |
| Channel Patterns | Plates | | Meandering | Mississippi River (Plate F-10) | | Braided | Colville River, Alaska (Plate
F-11) Yukon River, Alaska (Plate F-12) Brahmaputra River (Plate F-13) |
| Anastomosed | Burke and Hamilton
Rivers (Plate F-14) Cooper Creek (Plate F-15) Yangtze River (Plate
F-16) | | Distributary | Fans of
Southeast Iran (Plate F-17) Tian Shan, China Plate F-18) Kosi Fan (Plate
F-19) Niger River, Mali (Plate F-20) Pantanal, Brazil (Plate F-21) |
| Transitional | Amazon River
System 1. Manaus (Plate F-22) 2. Solimões River (Plate F-23) 3.
Japuré River (Plate F-24) 4. Ucayali River (Plate F-25) |
| Paleochannels | Teays River (Plate F-26)
Channeled Scabland (Plate F-27) |
DRAINAGE BASINS
The fluvial dissection of the landscape consists of valleys and their
included channelways organized into a system of connection known as a drainage
network. Drainage networks display many types of quantitative regularity that are
useful in analyzing both the fluvial systems and the terrains that they dissect
(Abrahams, 1984). One very useful property is the pattern of dissection (Figure 4-l). Howard (1967) has summarized the geological
significance of various drainage patterns (Table 4-3).
Dendritic patterns evident in a SIR-A (Shuttle Imaging Radar) image (Figure 4.2) are named for their similarity to branching
organic forms. Indeed, the conveyance qualities of such networks make them
morphologically similar to blood circulation systems, tree branching, and
landscape drainage. Excellent examples of dendritic patterns occur in the absence
of structural control, as on the Edwards Plateau of Texas (Plate F-1) and
the Loess Plateau of China (Plate F-2). Areas of trellis and rectangular
drainage include central Yemen (Plate F-5) and the Colorado Plateau
(Plate F-6), respectively. The Al Jafr area of Jordan (Plate F-4)
illustrates a centripetal pattern. An example of a drainage pattern not shown in
Figure 4-1 but readily recognized at a regional scale in Landsat imagery (Figure 4.3) is the pinnate pattern seen in tributaries
to the Dnestr River in the Moldavian S.S.R.
Table 4-3 Classification of Drainage
Patterns* | Pattern |
Significance | | Dendritic | Horizontal sediments
or uniformly resistent crystalline rocks; gentle regional slope at present or
at time of drainage inception | | Parallel | Moderate to
steep slopes; also in aeas of parallel elongate landforms |
| Trellis | Dipping or folded sedimentary, volcanic, or low-grade
metasedimentary rocks; areas of parellel fractures |
| Rectangular | Joints and/or faults at right angles; streams
and divides lack regional continuity | | Radial | Volcanoes,
domes, and residual erosion features | | Annular |
Structural domes and basins, diatremes, and possibly stocks |
*Modified from Howard (1967).
Drainage networks exist in spatially limited systems known as drainage basins.
The drainage network in a basin conveys water and sediment according to the
controls of climate, soils, geology, relief, and vegetation. One measure of the
network's efficiency is the drainage density, defined as the summation of channel
lengths per unit area. The study areas reveal a broad variety of drainage
densities.
STRUCTURE AND TECTONICS
Drainage may adjust passively to varying resistance of geologic materials, or
it may be actively induced to follow a particular course by tectonism. Examples
of the latter include faulting, as in the Ganges-Brahmaputra delta region
(Plate F-13). Growing folds and domes have affected drainage in the Colorado
Plateau (Plate F-6) and central Australia (Plate F-15). Subsidence has
been important in the Mississippi (Plate F-10) and Pantanal regions
(Plate F-21).
Streams that emerge from mountain fronts onto surrounding plains display a
fascinating array of structural and tectonic controls. Where mountain fronts are
erosional because of a complex interplay of geomorphic variables, they may
develop flanking surfaces of planation called pediments (Plate F-9).
Deposition at the mountain front produces alluvial fans because of the tremendous
increase in width as a stream emerges from a mountain canyon. Examples include
the Tian Shan (Plate F-18), Kosi (Plate F-19), and Pantanal
(Plate F-21) areas.
Passive adjustment to structure is a quality of nearly all the study areas.
Perhaps the most interesting situations, however, are drainage anomalies, where
streams cut across structural zones. Some streams appear to take the most
difficult routes possible through fold belts. In his studies of the Appalachians
and the Zagros Mountains, Oberlander (1985) has applied the term "obstinate
streams" to this phenomenon. The Finke River, described in Chapter 1
(Plate I-4), is an excellent example. The Colorado River (Plates F-6
and F-7) provides other examples.
CHANNEL PATTERNS
Rivers display a remarkable variety of channel patterns (Figure 4-4) that are especially amenable to study using
spaceborne remote sensing systems. The patterns relate to large-scale conditions
of climate and tectonism that can only be appreciated on a global perspective. It
is remarkable that, despite the geologic dominance of "big rivers"
(Potter, 1978), it is precisely those rivers that have received the least
study.
Experimental work by Schumm (1977) has done much to increase our understanding
of channel patterns. Pattern adjustments, measured as sinuosity variation, are
closely related to the type, size, and amount of sediment load. They are also
related to bank resistance and to the discharge characteristics of the stream.
Many of the morphological dependencies of river patterns can be summarized in the
following expressions:
These relationships are expressed by a large number of empirical equations
treating the important independent variables, Qw, a measure of mean
annual water discharge, and Qs, a measure of the type of sediment load
(ratio of bedload to total load). The dependent variables are the channel width,
W, depth, d, the slope of the river channel, S, the sinuosity, P (ratio of
channel length to valley length), and the meander wavelength, l (spacing of two successive bends in a meandering
river).
| Figure 4.1. Major types of drainage
patterns (Howard, 1967). |  |
The relationship of channel slope to sinuosity in an experimental river was
elaborated by Schumm and Kahn (1972). The data display a clear threshold
phenomenon (Figure 4-5), in which steep low-sinuosity
streams may change, somewhat abruptly, to somewhat less steep high-sinuosity
streams. The former comprise the bedload-type streams that yield braided
patterns, whereas the latter yield the familiar meandering patterns associated
with streams that transport a high suspended load. The shift between these two
stable pattern configurations is illustrated by several study areas, including
the Yukon (Plate F-12), Kosi (Plate F-19), Pantanal (Plate F-21), Japurá
(Plate F-24), and Ucayali (Plate F-25).
 | Figure
4-2.SIR-A radar image of dendritic drainage in east-central Columbia. Most
of the image shows an area of dissected plains with a grassland cover that yields
low radar return (dark tones). The drainage pattern is strongly enhanced in
radar return (bright tones) because the forested stream channels reflect the
radar energy back to the receiver. |
On the basis of the foregoing experimental work, a variety of pattern
classifications can be proposed (Schumm, 1981). However, the immense complexity
of natural fluvial systems appears to defy our present understanding (Baker,
1978a; Hickin, 1983). For this reason, the classification employed in Table 4-2 must be considered tentative.
Meandering Pattern
Meandering is the most common river pattern, and meandering rivers develop
alternating bends with an irregular spacing along the valley trend. Such rivers
tend to have relatively narrow, deep channels and stable banks. The system
adjusts to varying discharge by vertical accretion on its floodplain and/or
by lateral migration of its channel. A vast complex of floodplain depositional
features is associated with such rivers, as illustrated by the Mississippi River
study area (Plate F-10).
Braided Pattern
Braided rivers have channels divided into multiple thalwegs by alluvial
islands. Braided rivers tend to have steeper gradients, more variable discharge,
coarser sediment loads, and lower sinuosity than meandering streams. Their
channels tend to be relatively wide and shallow. Braided patterns are ". . .
developed depositionally within a channel in which the flow obstructions are sand
and gravel deposited by the water moving around them" (Garner, 1974, p.
435). Midchannel bars are emplaced because of local flow incompetence. The
resulting braid channels formed by splitting the flow are more competent than the
original channel for conveying the load downstream (Leopold et al., 1964).
Another way of describing braiding is that it is caused by channel widening that
increases the boundary resistance of rivers with noncohesive banks (Church, 1972,
p. 74). To maintain enough velocity for sediment transport in a wide, shallow
cross section, the channel must divide and form relatively narrow and deep
secondary channels through incision. Excellent examples of braiding occur in
gravel-transporting rivers, such as Yukon, Colville, and upper Kosi (Plates F-12,
F-11, and F-19, respectively). Braiding can also occur in sand-transporting
rivers, like the Brahmaputra (Plate F-13). The latter experience more frequent
and more complex modification of original bar forms.
| Figure 4-3. Pinnate drainage developed on
tributaries to the Dnestr River in parts of Moldavian S.S.R. and Ukrainian S.S.R.
Landsat E-2436-08080-7, April 2, 1976. |  |
Anastomosed Pattern
Many multichannel rivers have relatively low gradients, deep and narrow
channels, and stable banks. Such river systems have been termed
"anastomosed" (Smith and Smith, 1980). The terminology is a bit
confused because "anastomosis" is a general designation for
interconnected channelways whether in alluvial or in bedrock rivers. Thus, Garner
(1974, p. 435), following Bretz (1923), defined an anastomosing channel system as
". . . an erosionally developed network of channels in which the insular
flow obstructions represent relict topographic highs and often consist of
bedrock." Anastomosis is extensively developed in the Channeled Scabland
(Baker, 1978b). Therefore, anastomosing patterns can be considered to be composed
of multiple interconnecting channels separated by relatively stable areas of
floodplain (in the case of alluvial streams) or bedrock (in the case of bedrock
streams). In contrast, braided patterns are single-channel, multiple-thalweg
systems with bars of sediment or vegetated islands around which flow is diverted
in the channel.
Excellent examples of anastomosed streams occur in the plainslands of
east-central Australia (Rust, 1981). The Burke and Hamilton Rivers (Plate F-14)
and the Cooper Creek (Plate F-15) study areas illustrate these arid-region
varieties. Anastomosis also characterizes very large tropical rivers, such as
those in the Amazon Basin (Baker, 1978a). The Solimões and Japurá study
areas (Plates F-23 and F-24) illustrate such rivers.
Distributary Pattern
Distributary patterns occur where fluvial systems are spreading water and
sediment across depositional basins. Two varieties are fans and deltas. Fans
(Bull, 1977) develop in piedmont areas under the influence of both tectonic and
climatic controls. Arid-region alluvial fans are constructed by infrequent
depositional events that include both debris flows and water flows. Typical
arid-region fans occur in the Tucson and Tian Shan study areas (Plates F-9 and
F-18). Cold-climate alluvial fans occur in areas of glacial outwash and in
periglacial regions. An excellent example is the Sheenjek Fan in the Yukon River
study area (Plate F-12).
 | Figure
4-4.Geomorphic map of the fluvial landscape in northwestern Brazil near Fonte
Boa on the Solimões (Amazonas) River. Major tributaries are the Japurá
and Juruá Rivers. The map was prepared from an oblique color orbital
photograph (AST 21-1682) taken in July 1975, during the Apollo-Soyuz space
mission (Holtz et al., 1979). |
Humid-region alluvial fans are constructed by seasonal or perennial
fluvial flows. The Kosi Fan of Nepal and India (Plate F-19) is an example from an
area of active mountain building. The Pantanal study area (Plate F-21)
illustrates some large fans in the savanna tropics of Brazil.
Deltas are the subject of another chapter in this volume since most deltas
involve the interaction of ponded water systems (lakes and oceans) with sediment
delivered to a river mouth. However, some basins of deposition in arid regions
lack ponded water. Rivers entering these basins may produce typical deltaic
morphologies, as in the case of the Niger River study area in Mali, West Africa
(Plate F-20).
Transitional Patterns
Five study areas from the Amazon Basin illustrate the complexity of tropical
river systems. Many of these complexities arise because the fluvial system is not
merely an entity that is totally adjusted to the vagaries of modern conditions.
Rivers possess a heritage in which they inherit elements of ancient conditions.
Thus, old buried structures, relict alluvium, and progressive development
contribute detail to the modern fluvial landscape. The understanding of modern
rivers requires an understanding of their past history.
FLOODPLAINS AND TERRACES
Floodplains are the relatively broad and smooth valley floors constructed by
active rivers and periodically covered with floodwater during periods of overbank
flow. The floodplain is thus a part of the active erosional and depositional
activity of river channels. Floodplains consist of a great variety of
depositional materials, including colluvium (debris from valley sides), channel
deposits (sand and gravel), and vertical accretion deposits (clay and silt
deposited by overbank flows). In addition to fascinating channel patterns, the
following study areas illustrate many floodplain features: Mississippi River
(Plate F-10), Yukon River (Plate F-12), Brahmaputra River (Plate F-13), Cooper
Creek (Plate F-15), Yangtze River (Plate F-16), Manaus (Plate F-22),
Solimões (Plate F-23), Japurá (Plate F-24), and Ucayali River (Plate
F-25).
| Figure 4-5. Experimental relation between
slope and sinousity for an alluvial channel, showing threshold changes between
channel pattern types (Schumm and Kahn, 1972). |  |
River terraces are abandoned floodplains that formed when their associated
rivers flowed at high levels in the past. Many alluvial valleys contain complex
flights of river terraces, as in the Huang He region of China (Plate F-3). Such
terraces reflect numerous possible controls on river gradients, sedimentation,
and erosion, including climatic changes, tectonism (uplift or subsidence), sea
level changes, and other controls on base level. Distinguishing among these
various causative elements can be a very difficult problem in geomorphology.
PALEOCHANNELS
A remarkable diversity of ancient river courses can be identified on
large-format imagery. Many of the rivers responsible for these paleochannels
have experienced immense adjustments of discharge and sediment load, major
drainage diversions, and/or episodes of cataclysmic flooding. River
adjustments were especially pronounced in the transitions from glacial to
interglacial climates (Baker, 1983). The ancient Teays River system (Plate F-26)
and the Channeled Scabland (Plate F-27) are two study areas that illustrate these
phenomena.
The ability of orbital sensors to detect the regional associations of
paleochannels on a global basis should open fascinating opportunities for
paleohydrology. Pattern changes between paleochannels and modern channels should
be especially interesting. Schumm (1977) has termed such changes "river
metamorphosis." The directions and, in some cases, the magnitudes of change
can be deduced from various empirical relations and classifications summarized by
Schumm.
CONCLUSION
The study area descriptions that follow will elaborate the details of several
river systems. Although this chapter is but a brief introduction to fluvial
mega-geomorphology, it is hoped that it will convey the worthwhile
perspective on rivers afforded by considering them on large spatial and temporal
scales.
Continue to Plate F-1 |
Chapter Table of Contents. |
Complete Table of Contents |
Geomorphology Home
|
 |